Friday, February 12, 2010

The Latest from Boing Boing

The Latest from Boing Boing

Link to Boing Boing

Forced exorcism in Hong Kong shopping mall

Posted: 12 Feb 2010 05:35 AM PST

You don't need to be demon-possessed to experience an exorcism. Just walk into the wrong shopping mall in Hong Kong.

A Taoist master is accused of trying to extort nearly $5,000 for an unsolicited exorcism. From CNNGo:

We're strolling through a shopping mall, minding our own business, when we're suddenly pounced on by a Taoist priest telling us that we're possessed by an evil ghost who is hell-bent on killing us within three days. Temple workers proceed to grab hold of us and an exorcism is performed despite our protests. After an hour of struggle, the evil ghost is purged and we're asked to cough up HK$36,000 for the Taoist priest's good deed.

At least that's the picture that a 23-year-old woman surnamed Tang presented to the police. The priest's disciples even filmed the entire process of the exorcism and put it on Youtube. The woman was held down by five people while the priest covered her head with a red cloth. While she struggled, she was told to keep silent as the priest and his disciples were talking to the ghost.

The forced exorcism is captured on video (see above), and produced -- along with animated dramatization -- by Hong Kong's Next Media. (This is the same group made famous worldwide for the Tiger Woods car crash animation.)

Not quite Linda Blair. But definitely worse than that unsolicited cologne spritz at the mall.

Thanks Zoe!

Man smashes 27 TVs at Wal-Mart

Posted: 12 Feb 2010 02:13 AM PST

In this security footage from a Georgia Wal-Mart, a man smashes 27 televisions with a baseball bat he had picked up in the sporting good section.

There but for the grace of Cthulhu...

Raw Video: Man Smashes TVs at Wal-Mart (via Digg)

Nexus One writeup in Technology Review

Posted: 12 Feb 2010 02:08 AM PST

Technology Review's writeup of Google Nexus One phone hits all the high-notes. I've had one of these for a month now (we bought one for my wife and got another through Google's developer program) -- it replaced an aging and somewhat slow G1 I bought in 2008 -- and I am absolutely delighted with it. For one thing, it is fast as hell, which is very good for people like me with atrophied attention spans -- seriously, adding a lot of wellie to the CPU really shows off what the Android OS can do when it's matched with a decent processor. I kind of wish the battery would last a little longer (though I recognize that this is the opposite of wishing that the processor ran faster), but still, considering that this is a 1GHz CPU and that the battery lasts three times longer than my G1's did, I can hardly complain.

My next step is to root the phone so that I can do tethering with it -- that is, use it as a 3G modem for my laptop. I'll let you know where I get with that (and do drop by the comments if you have any tips on the subject).

The Nexus One, by contrast, has a one-gigahertz processor--more than 60 percent faster than the processors in the iPhone 3GS, Palm Pre, and BlackBerry Bold 9700, according to several benchmarks. In my testing, it took 2.5 seconds, on average, to click from one Wikipedia page to the next using T-Mobile's 3G network--and half that long when using a Wi-Fi connection. You can open applications, zoom in on photos, and search your phone's databases instantly. The faster processor dramatically improves the phone's enjoyability.

The Nexus One also has a beautiful high-resolution screen--800 by 480 pixels crammed into 3.7 diagonal inches for a display that's roughly 250 dots per inch, making even tiny text quite legible. (Apple's new iPad, in comparison, is 1,024 by 768 pixels on a screen that's 9.7 inches, for just 132 dots per inch.) The Nexus's five-megapixel camera can autofocus and takes detailed photos at six centimeters, and it has a surprisingly bright LED flash. The phone also has a standard 3.5-millimeter headphone jack, which means you don't need those bulky adapters to use high-end earbuds.

Review: Nexus One and Android 2.1 (via Memex 1.1)

Dreaming AI coming to Second Life

Posted: 12 Feb 2010 12:05 AM PST

Wagner James Au sez, "Second Life founder Philip Rosedale (who stepped down from managing the company he founded last year) is attempting an ambitious follow-up with his new spin-off company: Creating a sentient artificial intelligence which only exists in a virtual world, capable of thinking and dreaming. To do that, Rosedale will use Second Life's grid of thousands of servers as the AI's neural network. Or as his former CTO puts it, '[B]uilding Skynet always felt like an appropriate follow on to Second Life.'"

Philip Rosedale Attempting to Create Sentient Artificial Intelligence That Thinks and Dreams in Second Life! (Thanks, James!)



Kraken booze package

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:59 PM PST


As a near-total teetotaller, I'm in no position to weigh in on the quality of Kraken Spiced Rum (haven't tried it, it might taste like paint-thinner and strip the enamel off your teeth), but I am here to tell you that I am in major raptures over the absolutely ass-kicking media kit package they've put it in. Growing up, my grandparents on both sides had elaborate rec-room bars with racy cocktail glasses (the bikini girls would strip off if you filled the highballs with cold liquid) and superb novelty bottles: Bols liqueur bottles with windup ballerinas inside, Jim Beam bottles shaped like every US state, bottles shaped like the CN Tower, very tall banana liqueur bottles (just look at them!), little brown jugs with XX on them, and more. I've always had an affinity for this kind of thing, even if I have very little use for the stuff inside the bottles.

The Kraken Media Kit



YouTube speed tester: Net Neutrality judo will show you when your ISP is messing with you

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:50 PM PST


Google has rolled out a YouTube speed-tester that tells you how your ISP stacks up against other ISPs in your town and country, to "give you the ability to compare your speed numbers with other users in your region."

Translation: Google is giving you the ammo you need to fight back if your ISP sucks, or if it is twiddling the knobs to discriminate against Google. It's a brilliant piece of pro-Net Neutrality judo, and I can only hope that they follow it up by figuring out tools that let users speed test all kinds of services and protocols so that we can get a picture of how ISPs are messing with us.

YouTube Video Speed History (via DVICE)



Chip-and-PIN is broken

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:43 PM PST

Noted security researcher Ross Anderson and colleagues have published a paper showing how "Chip-and-PIN" (the European system for verifying credit- and debit-card transactions) has been thoroughly broken and cannot be considered secure any longer. I remember hearing rumbles that this attack was possible even as Chip-and-PIN was being rolled out across Europe, but that didn't stop the banks from pushing ahead with it, spending a fortune in the process.
The flaw is that when you put a card into a terminal, a negotiation takes place about how the cardholder should be authenticated: using a PIN, using a signature or not at all. This particular subprotocol is not authenticated, so you can trick the card into thinking it's doing a chip-and-signature transaction while the terminal thinks it's chip-and-PIN. The upshot is that you can buy stuff using a stolen card and a PIN of 0000 (or anything you want). We did so, on camera, using various journalists' cards. The transactions went through fine and the receipts say "Verified by PIN".

It's no surprise to us or bankers that this attack works offline (when the merchant cannot contact the bank) -- in fact Steven blogged about it here last August.

But the real shocker is that it works online too: even when the bank authorisation system has all the transaction data sent back to it for verification. The reason why it works can be quite subtle and convoluted: bank authorisation systems are complex beasts, including cryptographic checks, account checks, database checks, and interfaces with fraud detection systems which might apply a points-scoring system to the output of all the above. In theory all the data you need to spot the wedge attack will be present, but in practice? And most of all, how can you spot it if you're not even looking? The banks didn't even realise they needed to check.

Chip and PIN is broken (via Schneier)

(Image: Smartcard3.png, Wikimedia Commons)



Goofy Movie, by David Lynch

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:35 PM PST

HOWTO make paper animations like those in GALLOP

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:31 PM PST

Robert sez, "Rather than a multi-page flipbook, this Instructable shows how to create the illusion of movement with a single sheet of paper and transparency."

If you've seen books like the (absolutely excellent) Gallop, you're familiar with this effect. This project looks like a great way to take kids who love those books from readers to participants.

Make a Paper-based Animation



International Amateur Scanning League will rescue our video treasures!

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:25 PM PST

Rogue archivist Carl Malamud sez,
Boing Boing readers may be familiar with the FedFlix program, where Public.Resource.Org obtains government video and makes it available on YouTube, the Internet Archive, and our own Public Domain Stock Footage Library.

We took a big step forward today with the birth of a new club in Washington, the International Amateur Scanning League. These volunteers, organized by members of the DC CopyNight and by employees of the Smithsonian doing volunteer work after hours, is going out to the National Archives and Records Administration and copying over 1,500 DVDs to be uploaded to the net.

What makes this grassroots digitization effort so remarkable is that it has the full support of the government. Indeed, David Ferriero, the U.S. Archivist, joined me in the initial meeting where we taught volunteers how to rip DVDs!

You can read more about this new effort on my announcement at Radar O'Reilly and we posted photos of the initial meeting, which was hosted at the Sunlight Foundation in the middle of the Washington blizzard.

International Amateur Scanning League

Elaborate home-made pipe

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:15 PM PST

A brief history of pretty much everything, animated via flipbook

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 07:36 PM PST



Snow Warrior

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 07:18 PM PST

A family of National Geographic readers sculpted a snowman version of the Terra Cotta Warriors of Qin Shi Huang, First Emperor of China. Love it! (Thanks, Marylin Terrell!)



Ode to Snow-blower Man, hero of winter

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 07:07 PM PST

snowblowerman.jpg

The Washington Post creates a new folk hero for the Blizzard of 2010: That Guy Who Owns a Snowblower. Frankly, he already held an honored place in the Minnesota pantheon, but its nice to see his legend spread.

He arrives in a cloud of hissing white flakes with an unmistakable whine, leaving a trail of clear pavement in his wake. He accepts no money for his work. He moves so fast and is so bundled up against the cold you might not recognize him -- or even catch his name.

In snow-weary cul-de-sacs and buried hamlets across the region, Snowblower Guy has been the man of the hour, working for days not only to clear his driveway but also to help neighbors. He has cleared sidewalks and even carved out routes in roads still untouched by municipal snowplows. After so many mild winters, Snowblower Guy is finally having his moment.

Image courtesy Flickr user bossco, via CC



Highlights from TED 2010, Thursday: "Shooting mosquitoes out of the sky with lasers"

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 07:49 PM PST

Here's my round up of highlights from the second day of the TED 2010 presentations. My head is abuzz with all the thought-provoking ideas I learned today. (Here's yesterday's roundup.)

Picture 9-11 Inventor Nathan Myhrvold, of Intellectual Ventures had the most entertaining presentation of the day: a mosquito death ray. It's part of a plan to eradicate malaria and it's being funded by Myhrvold's former boss, Bill Gates.

First Myhrvold showed off a container that can keep vaccination medicine cold and fresh for six months. The old way -- a styrofoam cooler with ice -- keeps the medicine cold for just four hours. The new container loses less than 1/2 watt. It's similar to a cryogenic dewar, with the same kind of insulation. But this one works like a Coke machine, vending out vials one-at-a-time so warm air never gets inside the container.

Next, malaria. Every 43 seconds a kid dies of malaria in Africa. What can we do about it? Spraying is effective, but there are environmental issues. There's not an effective vaccine yet. Bed nets are effective, if you use them, but people use them for fishnets instead, and it won't make malaria extinct.

So Myhrvold and his colleagues have invented several technologies to fight malaria. First is a little gadget to make an automatic malaria diagnosis. It doesn't draw blood. It looks at the whites of eyes or through fingernails for the presence of hemozoin, which is produced by the malaria parasite.

They are also developing a system that filters out the parasites in a patient's blood, like a dialysis machine, but this one relives the parasite load.

Myrvold's invention company has a supercomputer they like to use for modeling. They're using it to figure out the most most effective malaria eradication technique. He showed a map of Madagascar, with every road and village, and rain and humidity information (which tells you if you have standing water for mosquitoes to breed). It displays a heat map of malaria. It waxes and wanes as seasons change from wet to dry. "We want to eradicate malaria thousands of times in software before we do it in real life."

Now the fun stuff: Shoot mosquitoes out of the sky with lasers. ("A pinkie-suck idea.") It can be built with consumer electronics -- a Blu-ray player has a blue laser, a laser printer has fast-moving mirror. You can use them around clinics. The shoot 100% organic photons. You can measure wingbeat frequency and size the of flying insect and decide whether it is worth killing. Moore's law makes technology so cheap we can decide whether or not to kill a bug.

They have one here, built from parts purchased on eBay. They are using a green laser pointer instead of a killing laser, for safety reasons. We see a box of skeeters being tracked and zapped. We hear the mosquito wingbeat.

He ends the presentation showing a high-speed, slow-motion, super-close-up video of mosquitoes getting blasted out of the sky in mid-flight. A wisp of smoke curls up with each zapped mosquito. "This is very satisfying." Here are some videos.



Picture 7-14

ENDING SLAVERY

27 million human beings live on Earth as slaves. Kevin Bales is leading the effort to end the contemporary slave trade.

He's the co-founder of Free the Slaves, an organization dedicated to ending slavery around the world in 25 years. I liked his optimism.

In the early 1990s, Bales was at a public event and he picked up a leaflet about slavery. His first reaction: "No way." As a sociology professor, he had never heard of modern slavery and so he didn't believe it. But he did a literature review and found 3000 articles about slavery. Two were about contemporary slavery. He continued researching and started visiting countries with the highest density of slavery: africa, india, eastern europe. "This is real slavery -- not bad marriages or jobs that suck. These are people who cannot walk away without being killed. They don't get paid." (Only Iceland and Greenland have no slaves.)

The recipe for slavery: civil wars and ethnic conflicts create destitute people. The absence of the rule of law -- allowing thugs to use violence with impunity -- turns destitutes into slaves.

The effects of slavery, beyond the obvious human suffering: it's hurting the planet. Slaves are used in destructive, poison-spewing work that ruins the environment.

Here's how to become a slave: live in a country where lawlessness prevails. Have no way to work. Have children who are starving. Eventually man will drive a pickup truck into your village and say: "Want a job? Get in the truck." The guy will look sketchy and you will be suspicious but you get in the truck, because there's no other option. You'll be taken away and ordered to perform dirt,y dangerous work. You won't be paid and you won't be allowed to stop working. You will come to the realization you are a slave.

Contemporary slavery is the same as old slavery, with an important exception: there is a complete collapse in the price of human beings. Slavery used to be very expensive. Now slaves are incredibly cheap. You can buy one for $5 or $10 in India. If you live in the United States, you'll pay between $3,000 and $8,000 for a slave. In any case, human slaves are like "styrofoam cups. You use them then throw them away."

Perversely, this is good news, because it means the slave trade is not very profitable. Other "good" news: slave labor generates just $40 billion a year. That's the smallest number ever, adjust for inflation. The slave trade is "standing on the precipice of its own extinction." The total cost of sustainable freedom for 27 million slaves is just $10.8 billion. That money cannot be used to buy people out of slavery. That won't work. "Liberation and the work after liberation is the answer." We must learn from the "botched emancipation" of 1865, in which slaves were liberated then dumped, sentenced to generations of violence, poverty, and discrimination.

Ex-slaves are working to free others. "Frederick Douglass in in the house!" For first time in Ghana, three human traffickers were imprisoned for trading in child slaves for the fishing industry.

Are we willing to live in a world of slavery? It's a horrific fundamental violation of our civil liberty. If we can't end slavery, are we truly free?


Ted2010 06862 D72 7957 Pr-1



Nicholas Christakis at TED2010, Session 4, "Reason," Thursday, February 11, 2010, in Long Beach, California. Credit: TED / James Duncan Davidson



YOUR GENES AND YOUR SOCIAL NETWORK


Your genes have a lot to do with your place and behavior in social networks, says Nicholas A. Christakis, a Harvard medical doctor and social scientist who "conducts research on social factors that affect health, health care, and longevity."

Christakis has been analyzing obesity and social networks, looking for correlations. It turns out that obese people cluster together in social networks. Also, you can see clusters of smoking, drinking, altruism, and divorce.

"The network has a memory, it moves, things flow through it. Is has a resilience that allows it to persist over time. It's a living thing."

Emotions, too, flow through networks. When we have emotions we show them and others can read them, and they copy them. They're contagious.

There are different kinds of emotional contagions. One kind is the "punctuated outburst," like a riot. The other kind of emotional contagion spreads over time with larger numbers of people. These "emotional stampedes" ripple through social networks. Christakis found "happiness clusters" and "unhappiness clusters." It's like a patchwork quilt, with happy and unhappy patches, and your happiness depends on what patch you are in.

Here's the difference between the happy and unhappy patches: Unhappy patches are on the edges of networks; happy patches are in the center of the quilt.

Christakis showed a social network with connected nodes, each node representing a person with lines representing links to friends. He pointed out two nodes, each of which was connected to four friends. In one case, the four friends were connected to each other, and in the other case the four friends were not connected to each other. I found his comment about this especially interesting: "Your genes determine whether your friends know each other or not. Some people like to introduce their friends to each other and knit their network tightly. Others like to keep their friends separate.

The connections in a social network defines the nature of the resulting "superorganism." Compare a lump of coal with a diamond. Same atoms, but the pattern of the connections gives them different properties. In a social network, the patterns of connections confer different properties on groups of people. The architecture of ties between people defines the kind of superorganism you are in.

Final thought: Social networks can be used to spread good and bad things, but social networks are fundamentally related to goodness. "If I made you sad or gave you germs, you would cut the ties with me," so those network paths get pruned and the nodes become isolated to the edges. But nodes that spread good ideas, love, and other things of value get more connections.



Ted2010 08063 D31 9364 Pr

Michael Sandel at TED2010, Session 5, "Provocation," Thursday, February 11, 2010, in Long Beach, California. Credit: TED / James Duncan Davidson



GIVING PEOPLE WHAT THEY DESERVE

Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel started out with a quote from Aristotle: "justice means giving people what they deserve." He gave the example of distributing flutes to people. He asked the audience: "Who should get the best flutes?" The audience shouted out opinions: "Give them to the best players," "the worst players," "distribute them randomly."

Aristotle said the flutes should go to the best players. Why? One audience member said, "We'll hear better music if best players get the best flutes. We will all be better off."

Aristotle's reason was different: We give the best flutes to the best players because that's what flutes are for. To be played well, and we must honor and recognize the best musicians.

Sandel described a court case involving a pro golfer by the name of Casey Martin. He was born with a defect in his right leg that makes it very painful (even dangerous) for him to walk very far. He asked the PGA if he could use a golf cart in tournaments. The PGA deliberated, came back and said "No. That would give you an unfair advantage over the other players who must follow the rules that require them to walk."

Martin sued, saying the PGA's ruling violated the Americans with Disabilities act. Sandel polled the TEDsters: if you were a judge how would you rule? There was a good division of opinion. A woman in the audience, named Charlie, said she would rule in favor of Casey because, "walking the course is not part of the game of golf." Another audience member, named Warren, replied that the "endurance element is an important part of the game." (When asked if he golfed, Warren said, "I'm not a golfer." Charlie fired back, "And I am!")

Sandel described what happened in the case. The lower court brought in golfing greats to testify -- Nicklaus, Palmer. They all said that the fatigue factor is an important part of the game and therefore walking is fundamental to the nature of the game. But when the case went to the Supreme Court, the judges ruled 7-to-2 in favor of Casey. The majority of the judges agreed that walking was not part of the essential nature of golf. Scalia dissented, saying it's not posible to determine the essential nature of a game like golf. Since a game has no purpose other than amusement, it is impossible to say if any of a game's arbitrary rules are essential.

Scalia's opinion is questionable: if sports fans thought rules were arbitrary and not designed to bring out the best in the people who played the sports they wouldn't care about the game.

With golf, as with flutes, it's hard to decide what is justice without looking at the essential nature of the activity and what qualities are worthy of honor and recognition. You can look at same-sex marriage through the same lens. Sandel asked the audience whether or not same sex marriage should be allowed (I saw one man raise his hand opposing same sex marriage). People against same-sex marriage consider the nature of marriage to be procreation, and people in favor say lifelong loving commitment is the nature of marriage.

Sandel's conclusion: A way towards mutual respect is to engage directly with each other's deepest moral convictions. This will restore democratic discourse.




The splendor of the Boing Boing Bazaar!

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 07:53 PM PST

201002102230

At great hazard to life and limb, the editors of Boing Boing have scoured the most exotic corners of our vast and wondrous planet -- from her inky ocean floors to her highest peaks -- bringing back to you a most extraordinary collection of astounding oddities, curious novelties, and sensational artifacts, available at prices that confound our competitors and incite jealousy amongst the most intrepid collectors of natural and manmade marvels. Behold the splendor of the Boing Boing Bazaar!

The items for sale in the Bazaar have been personally curated by the editors of Boing Boing. We will add new items when we come across ones wonderful enough to include in our display case, so check back often. Here's more information about the Boing Boing Bazaar (which is part of the new Makers Market) from Dan Woods, general manger of Maker Retail:

After almost a year of development, we're proud to take the wraps off of our newest ecommerce offering -- Makers Market, a curated marketplace of wonderful science, tech, and artistic creations created and sold directly by some of our favorite Makers from around the World.  

A collaboration between MAKE and Boing Boing, Makers Market brings together our favorite entrepreneurial makers and artists selling products and services directly to DIY enthusiasts - people with a thirst for life-enriching exploration through hands-on science and tech projects, risk-taking, art, sustainability, self-reliance, and hands-on learning. And true to our character, we'll toss in a pinch of mischief-making from time to time for good measure.  

Most of the sellers you'll discover in Makers Market are makers whom we've come to know through the course of our work producing MAKE, Boing Boing.net, Make: Online, CRAFT, Maker Faire and Make: television. Each was selected by the staff at MAKE or by the Boing Boing crew and personally invited to open a storefront in the market. The products you'll find here were either made by, rebuilt by, or substantially produced by the maker selling them. We call this "Maker-Made."  

Each participating maker has their own store front where they showcase their work and sell their products, host their own blog, post pictures and videos, and communicate with their customers and the DIY community at large. MAKE provides the web service, the tools and the community.  Sellers are responsible for doing their own product fulfillment and for bringing their unique character, energy and DIY spirit to the marketplace.  

We invite you to stop by MakersMarket.com and check it out.  If you're an indie maker and you have a product or service you think you'd like to sell in Makers Market, visit the Seller FAQs.  Nominating yourself as a seller is easy and takes just a few minutes.  We'll review your information and generally get back to you in a day or two.

  Boing Boing Bazaar

Palm Pre production halted. True enough, but...

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 06:20 PM PST

When you read the news, you'll often see quotes from analysts. It's the result of a quid-pro-quo: the reporter gets a "researcher" to whom a statement can be attributed, and the analyst's reputation gets buffed in print. But most analysts know little more than reporters: they just sell their research privately instead of using it to pursue stories. At best, they act as a dial-a-quote service, used to launder opinion into news--it's a way to create multiple-source stories on deadline. At worst, analysts set out to place stories in the press to influence markets and make money for clients. Today offers some intrigue, with OTR Global claiming that Palm has suddenly shut down production of cellphones. This was debunked with prejudice by Engadget's Nilay Patel, who reports that it's Chinese New Year and the workers are off. This leaves an interesting question: was the report the result of sheer ignorance of a temporary holiday halt? Or was it an attempt to create a desired outcome by willfully misrepresenting it?

TED fellow using nanoparticle paint

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 02:14 PM PST

001B_NANO.jpg Kate Nichols is a painter trained in 15th century Northern Renaissance techniques. But this week she will give a presentation at TED, perhaps the most prestigious big-think technology conference. Her topic? Nanotechnology. 

It might sound bizarre, but when you listen to the story of Nichols' quest to recreate the brilliant blue iridescence of the Morpho butterfly, her scientific presentation makes perfect sense.   

Nichols learned painting as painters did in 15th century Flanders: by apprenticing under a master and learning to make her own paints. She became skilled at creating the type of complex colors only possible as light travels through thin layers of oil glaze. But she eventually found that no amount of layering could recreate the complexity she saw in the Morpho butterfly's wings. 

[More images and more about the artist after the jump]



001_NANO.jpgStudying with mathematician Judy Holdener at Kenyon College, Nichols discovered that the brilliance of the butterfly's wings did not come from chemical coloring, as is the case with paint, but from the shape of super tiny structures inside the wing.

It's called structural color, and it became Nichol's goal to incorporate it into her work.

"I realized that I would have to use architectures much smaller than those you can create with thin oil glazes in order to generate structural color effects," Nichols said.

Enter nanotechnology. Through some research of her own, Nichols realized she needed to work at the nanoscale. So she wrote an email to Paul Alivisatos, who runs a nanotechnology lab at the University of California at Berkeley (he's also director of Lawrence Berkeley National Lab).

In 2008, she became the first artist-in-residence in his lab. 

004_NANO.jpg

Nichols was recently named a TED fellow. See her TED page here. Also check out her website to see her nano-art as well as her amazing oil paintings. 

004B_NANO.jpg




IMAGES:


007_NANO.jpg
1. Morpho. 18" x 7". Silver nanoparticles, silver halide emulsion, gelatin, glass microscope slides. 2009. 


The black elements in this piece are glass microscope slides coated in gelatin and a silver photographic emulsion. The yellow and the blue are silver nanoparticles. They appear to be different colors when viewed with reflected light versus transmitted light. Inserting a black slide behind one of the nanoparticle-coated slides inhibits the transmitted light, emphasizing the reflected, resulting in a blue color. Nichols likes the juxtaposition of the colorful nanoscale silver with the more familiar black and gray forms of silver.


2. Calibrate 1. 8" x 5", Silver nanoprisms, glass capillaries. 2009.


The color in this piece is due to a phenomenon called plasmon resonance. "I love thinking about plasmon resonance--likely, because I paint motion and grew up dancing," Nichols said. When light comes into contact with a metal, electrons are displaced. Because the electrons are attracted to the nuclei of the metallic atoms, the electrons fall back into their original positions only to be exiled again, over and over. This oscillatory dance is called a plasmon and we perceived it as color when the wavelength falls within the visible spectrum.

007B.jpg


3. Mirrored lamellae 2. 3" x 3". Silver nanoparticles, silver halide emulsion, gelatin, glass microscope slides, wax. 2009. 


This piece because demonstrates best how the colors change depending on the viewer's perspective. The detail shows how it look pinks from one angle and blue from another. Nichols called it "mirrored lamella" because to create it she layered clear microscope slides on top of black slides covered with a photographic emulsion to create a mirror (she also learned Victorian mirror making techniques!). The image on the nanoparticle-coated slide reverberates through these layers, causing interesting, colorful effects. 

Silver_prisms.jpg

Artist chases Paperchase over swiped character

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 09:12 PM PST

paperchaseallegedplagiarism.jpg Paperchase is 'strenuously' denying allegations of plagiarism leveled after art similar to work by Hidden Eloise was spotted adorning its products. On the left, the original painting. On the right, the design as printed on bags and other items by the British stationery company. (The photo is from iworkatborders' livejournal.) After the topic fired up Twitter, Paperchase posted a statement claiming that it bought the design 'in good faith' from a 'reputable' agency, which itself denies plagiarizing her artwork.

Hidden Eloise responds:

Paperchase seems to think that it is a great excuse that they bought the infringing design from an outside source. Paperchase ignores that they were the ones selling the products. It doesn't matter how you obtained them. What matters is that you had a chance to act upon this matter in November when I contacted you and you never did. Now you are blaming someone else and you are still denying what is in front of your very eyes. Plagiarism that is. Everybody but you seems to believe so.

Actually, let me correct myself in that Paperchase is not "denying" plagiarism. They are just saying that they would never knowingly sell plagiarised material. Which I'm sure is exactly what their expensive lawyers advised them to say so that Paperchse has plausible deniability in court.

Eloise complains that Paperchase has released more products featuring the design since being shown the original. Lawyers ask for "astronomical amounts of money" to go after them, she adds.

Chasing paperchase [Hide n Seek] (The artwork is for sale here)

Paperchase forced to deny it 'plagiarised' British artist's work after Twitter campaign [Telegraph]



Anthropomorphize your pets with the Pet Speaker

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 12:01 PM PST

Text.jpgPet Acoustics' "My Pet Speaker" purports to entertain animals by transforming your music into sounds they enjoy. It is recommended for dogs, cats, and horses. My suspicion is that this $250 item's only verifiable success is turning the press release cliché "unleashed" into a pun. [Pet Acoustics]

Read this: The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:31 AM PST

helacells.jpg

What happens to the blood you leave at the doctor's office? The little plastic cups full of urine? That mole you had removed that one time?

All those samples get tested, of course. But what then? The trash? Not always, writes Rebecca Skloot, in her new book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Sometimes, they end up in storage. In fact, according to Skloot, every one of us probably has some biological material on file somewhere. The samples are kept for research, on the off chance that a part of you might someday be interesting to science. You'll likely never know for sure, though, because nobody is under any obligation to tell you about it.

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is a book about the imbalance between the needs of medical science and the individual impacts of medical ethics (or the lack thereof). At its heart is the story of a woman—whose fatal cancer led to some of the major scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century—and the family who suffered through her death, then found out 30 years later about her afterlife in a petri dish.

Henrietta Lacks was a black woman, born on land left to her ancestors by the former slave owners who'd fathered them. She married, moved to Baltimore, had five children. When she was 31, Henrietta died, the victim of a frighteningly fast-moving cervical cancer. That was 1951.

But not all of Henrietta had been laid to rest. Cancer cells, taken before and after her death by doctors at Johns Hopkins, had become the first human cells to grow and thrive in the lab, living and multiplying indefinitely in test tubes around the world. Known as the HeLa cell line, little parts of Henrietta Lacks helped develop the polio vaccine, chemotherapy, in vitro fertilization and more.

It might be a story of human triumph, except that nobody got Henrietta's permission to use those cells for research. No one told her family about the samples. In fact, the Lacks' only learned about Henrietta's immortal life in 1973, from a chance conversation with a friend who worked at the National Cancer Institute.

"Henrietta Lacks is your mother-in-law?" he asked, suddenly excited. "Did she die of cervical cancer?"
Bobette stopped smiling and snapped, "How'd you know that?"

"Those cells in my lab have to be hers," he said. "They're from a black woman named Henrietta Lacks who died of cervical cancer at Hopkins in the fifties."

"What?!" Bobbette yelled, jumping up from her chair. "What you mean you got her cells in your lab?"

He held his hands up, like Whoa, wait a minute. "I ordered them from a supplier just like everybody else."

"What do you mean, 'everybody else'?!" Bobbette snapped. "What supplier? Who's got cells from my mother-in-law?"

That clash permeates the whole of Skloot's book. Time and time again we meet excited, grateful, clueless scientists who are thrilled and inspired by the research HeLa cells made possible, and don't understand why the same history makes the Lacks family furious. Over the years, scientists and researchers flitted in and out of the Lacks' life, taking blood samples, congratulating them on being related to such important cells, but never explaining what had happened to Henrietta the person, what implications her death had for her children's health, or what, beyond buzzwords and jargon, was currently happening to Henrietta's cells. And, despite the profits made off direct HeLa sales and indirect HeLa research, nobody has ever offered the Lacks' a cut. The children of the woman behind some of the greatest advances in medical science can't afford health care.

Skloot's book tells the story of HeLa as the story of Henrietta and the Lacks family, especially Henrietta's daughter Deborah, who was only a toddler when Henrietta died. For Deborah, understanding HeLa was about finding a connection to the mother she never knew. It's a unique perspective on scientific history. In fact, the story of HeLa cells has been told before, but by writers who mostly ignored the Lacks family—focusing instead on the brave and bold scientists—or just talked about their victimization. By letting the Lacks' be people, and by putting them in the center of the history, Skloot turns just another tale about the march of progress into a complicated portrait of the interaction between science and human lives.

Ultimately, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks forces us to ask what we're willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Are lifesaving medical breakthroughs worth it if we can only get them—as researchers have successfully argued in court—by studying tissues taken from patients who aren't told how their cells are being used and aren't included in the patents or profits made on those cells? There's no easy answer. But facing the story of the Lacks family puts us in a much better position to move beyond either/or false dichotomies and start creating a new laws that make medicine more fair.

You can show your appreciation for the ways HeLa cells have improved public health by donating to the Henrietta Lacks Foundation. Founded by author Rebecca Skloot, the Foundation is raising money for scholarships for Henrietta Lacks' descendants, and to help cover the cost of health care for her family. The Foundation gives "those who have benefited from HeLa cells—including scientists, universities, corporations, and the general public—a way to show thanks to Henrietta and her family."

Disclosure: This review was based on a press copy of the book, which I received for free from Crown Publishing.

Image of stained HeLa cells courtesy GE Healthcare (by way of Henrietta Lacks) via CC



Real world Lichtenstein girl

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 10:35 AM PST

A MAC cosmetics shoot recreated Roy Lichtenstein's halftone-dot comic-girl to very good effect.

The Real life Lichtenstein-Comic-Girl (Thanks, Patrick!)




Japan Sea and Air Exhibition poster, circa 1930

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 10:30 AM PST

Alexander McQueen has died

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 09:53 AM PST

The great fashion designer Alexander McQueen has died.

NPR features breakup songs for V-day

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 09:43 AM PST

To celebrate Valentine's Day, NPR's All Songs Considered is featuring a bunch of breakup songs. My favorite breakup song is Take a Bow by Rihanna, what's yours?

Xeni curating YouTube's homepage for the day

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 11:22 AM PST

xeniguesteditor.jpg YouTube's selected Xeni as Curator of the Month! She'll be picking interesting new videos (including some we've featured here) and some all-time-greats for inclusion on YouTube's front door for the rest of the day. From its official blog:
We're pleased to have Xeni Jardin of Boing Boing curate our homepage today. She goes deep into the Boing Boing archives to give you her personal take on the interesting, funny and sometimes out-there videos that thrive on Boing Boing and YouTube. Below is a video she made just for the occasion, as well as some insightful notes about her selections. To view the full playlist, click here.
Don't miss our channel at YouTube, BoingBoingVideo, too! Curator of the Month: Boing Boing Video [YouTube's blogspot] Guest Editor Channel [YouTube]

Whisky toothpaste

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 08:29 AM PST

Romantic V-day song

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 08:26 AM PST

djBC sez, "For Valentine's Day. Ska/Punk brats Big D and The Kids Table grow up and invent 'Stroll Music,' a fusion of classic R&B, ska, reggae, jazz, and rock. This tune reminds me of the best things about 'Exile On Main Street' - it's a paean to the healing power of travel, adventure and instant relocation. The video was made on a shoestring budget (the flashing lights outside were controlled by kids flicking light switches in time with the music), but they was somehow able to wrangle an airplane, and much of it was shot in the same building as Saw 2 (!). Favorite quote: 'You're much happier when you sing / about how much you dig everything.'"

BIG D & THE KIDS TABLE - We Can Live Anywhere (Thanks, djBC!)



Sarcasm: Save the newspaper!

Posted: 11 Feb 2010 07:58 AM PST

IFTF's public FutureCast phone call with guest hardware hacker Phil Torrone

Posted: 09 Feb 2010 10:44 AM PST

 Tmp  67 52 92 67529258 67529258 300  Tmp  Upload 2009 07 Pt6B
My Institute for the Future colleagues Kathi Vian and Jerry Michalski are holding their next FutureCast open telephone call today, Thursday, February 11, from 11am - noon (PST). The guest is our pal Philip Torrone, senior editor of MAKE: and creative director of Adafruit Industries. The topic is open source hardware, hacker spaces, and the emerging maker movement. Please call in! The conversation will be recorded and featured as a podcast on the IFTF Future Now blog. To dial-in today, between 11am and noon PST:
Toll Free number: 1-800-868-1837
International number: 1-404-920-6440
Participant code: 548723#
FutureCast: open-source hardware and MAKE-ing the future

No comments:

Post a Comment

CrunchyTech

Blog Archive